The errors and misstatements in “Climate Denialism”

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Thats the bar by which I was judged when I put in academic papers. Thats decades in the past so maybe things have changed a lot since I spent time on a campus. What we have now, especially in so-called Climate Science is so wrecked that I don’t think it’s worth saving. They think that decades or completely BS papers are evidence in themselves even if there is not a shred of real evidence in the papers themselves. And the peers need to be flushed out and shamed. They need to be made to bear the consequences of their collaboration. Only transparency will solve this. Thats why they fear transparency so much. 

Linkedin Thread