The latest travesty in ‘consensus enforcement’
If the Alarmist position would have any substance at all, they would not have to resort to such a sham. Just think about it. When you know that your position is untenable but you must absolutely persevere – what do you do? Exactly, you scratch anything that you can use to manufacture anything that resembles evidence backing you up. If you had quality evidence, you would not have to resort to such shoddy tricks. You would lean back, confident that your superior evidence will carry the day. But they can’t do that – they know that their case falls apart faster than a tower of wooden blocks facing a toddler so they need to use whatever crap they can cook up. Oh, I did it again. I mentioned Cook – makes me think of his cooked up 97%.
Climate Etc. 
